"This USDA website will not be updated during a lapse in federal funding. Content on this website will not be current or maintained until funding issues have been resolved. However, if there is information that affects security, life, and property, this website will continue to update that information during a funding lapse."


Softwood lumber products in the United States: substitutes, complements, or unrelated?

This study addresses an important dimension concerning the softwood lumber trade dispute between United States and Canada-substitutability among imported and domestically produced species. We employ the restricted translog subcost function approach to study this issue based on the monthly data of US softwood products consumption and prices between Jan. 1989 and July 2001. The results show that the spruce-pine-fir lumber species group, mainly imported from Canada, is largely unrelated to domestically produced treated southern yellow pine, Douglas-fir, and other species groups, but is a substitute to untreated southern yellow pine and engineered wood products. Furthermore, untreated southern yellow pine is facing more severe competition from structural panels rather than from the imported Canadian spruce-pine-fir group.


Nagubadi, Rao V.
Zhang, Daowei
Prestemon, Jeffrey P.
Wear, David N.

Miscellaneous Publication

Forest Science 50(4):416-426

Nagubadi, Rao V.; Zhang, Daowei; Prestemon, Jeffrey P.; Wear, David N. 2004. Softwood lumber products in the United States: substitutes, complements, or unrelated?. Forest Science 50(4):416-426

Refine Search

Personal tools